Declaration of Conformity – Then and Now

The Declaration of Conformity (DoC) is a critical document and serves as a formal statement by the manufacturer that a product meets all the relevant regulatory requirements. This declaration is not just a piece of paper; it represents the culmination of extensive testing, documentation, and verification processes, ensuring that the device is safe and effective for its intended use.

However, as regulations evolve, so do the requirements for the DoC. The transition from the Medical Device Directive (MDD) to the Medical Device Regulation (MDR) has brought significant changes that manufacturers must navigate carefully. In this blog, we will explore how to identify the needed content for a DoC, and discuss the challenges involved in setting up a correct DoC.

Identifying the required content for the Declaration of Conformity

The content of a Declaration of Conformity must be precise and comprehensive. The content of the DoC can be found in annex IV in the MDR.

  • Signature and Date: The DoC must be signed by a person authorized by the manufacturer, with the date of issue clearly indicated.
  • Manufacturer Information: The name and address of the manufacturer, and if applicable, authorized representative.
  • Device Identification: The product name, model, and any relevant identifiers like the Basic UDI-DI (Unique Device Identification – Device Identifier).
  • Regulatory Compliance: A list of the applicable regulations. Additionally, to the MDR or IVDR the medical device might also fall under further regulations or directives such as the machinery directive. Under MDR, this also includes specific references to the Common Specifications (CS) if applicable.
  • Conformity Assessment: Details of the conformity assessment procedure followed, including the involvement of a Notified Body if required. The DoC must include the Notified Body’s identification number.
  • Statement of Conformity: A formal declaration by the manufacturer that the device complies with the relevant regulations and standards.

What about harmonized standards or standards in general?

Many manufacturers list the (harmonized) standards in their declaration of conformity. When reviewing the technical documentation of the customers, I missed the list of (harmonized) standards. Therefore, I looked into the regulations (MDD and MDR), and neither MDD nor MDR explicitly require the listing of (harmonized) standards or other standards directly within the DoC. However, the use of harmonized standards is a key aspect of demonstrating conformity, and while the standards themselves are not required to be listed in the DoC, their role is significant in the overall compliance process.

Verena Wieser, Medical device consultant at Lorit

Verena Wieser, Medical Device Consultant

Lorit Consultancy can expertly guide you through complex regulatory requirements in the medical and automotive sector. Contact us using our contact form or send a direct request to info@lorit-consultancy.com.

Learn more

In the MDD, the concept of using harmonized standards is discussed, particularly in relation to demonstrating conformity with the essential requirements of the Directive. However, the Directive does not explicitly mandate the inclusion of a list of standards in the Declaration of Conformity. Annex II (Full Quality Assurance System) and Annex VII (EC Declaration of Conformity) discuss conformity assessments and the use of harmonized standards, but they do not require the standards to be listed in the DoC.

In the MDR the use of harmonized standards is also a key method for demonstrating compliance with the General Safety and Performance Requirements (GSPR). While the MDR encourages the use of harmonized standards to achieve presumption of conformity, it similarly does not explicitly require these standards to be listed within the Declaration of Conformity. Article 19 and Annex IV outline what should be included in the DoC. Annex IV does not specify that harmonized standards or any standards need to be listed, but it emphasizes the importance of demonstrating conformity with the GSPR.

In practice, although not mandated, manufacturers often include references to relevant (harmonized) standards in the DoC or other technical documentation to demonstrate how conformity with the essential requirements (MDD) or the GSPR (MDR) was achieved. This practice is common because it provides clarity and transparency in how compliance was achieved, especially during audits or inspections by Notified Bodies or regulators. While not required by law, including these standards in the DoC or associated documentation is considered good practice for clear communication and demonstration of compliance.

The advantages of including the standards are obvious. Including the standards helps demonstrate that the product complies with recognized benchmarks, which can streamline regulatory reviews and audits. It provides clarity and transparency to regulators, Notified Bodies, and customers about how the manufacturer achieved compliance with the essential requirements or GSPRs. And last, during audits or inspections, having the standards listed can make it easier for auditors to verify compliance, potentially reducing the time and effort required to pass an audit.

There are also disadvantages. Standards can be updated or replaced over time. If the standards listed in the DoC become outdated, the DoC itself may be considered out of date, which could necessitate frequent updates to maintain regulatory compliance. Updating the DoC to reflect changes in the standards can be an administrative burden, particularly if changes occur frequently. This can add complexity to maintaining compliance documentation. By explicitly listing the standards, a manufacturer may inadvertently create regulatory risks if there is a dispute over whether the product truly meets all aspects of the listed standards. This could occur if there’s a difference in interpretation, or if the product fails to fully comply with a newer version of the standard.

While no requirement for the listing of (harmonized) standards can be found in MDD or MDR, the guidance documents are contradicting. The guidance from the EK MED 3.9 A.4  lists standards as additional information but says: “Optional; If standards are mentioned, all applicable parts of the standards must be fulfilled.”, indicating that it is not mandatory to list (harmonized) standards. On the Your Europe website (a European Commission website which provides information to citizens and businesses on their rights in the EU) harmonized standards are listed of the required content for an DoC. The website is applicable to every kind of product that is regulated in the European Union and not limited to medical devices. In other regulations such as the EMC directive, a separate requirement (Annex IV point 6) for not only the listing of harmonized standards but also the need for the date of the standard is available.

Conclusion

The DoC is a cornerstone of regulatory compliance in the medical device industry. As the industry transitions from the MDD to the MDR, the requirements for this document have become more detailed and rigorous. Manufacturers must carefully navigate these changes, ensuring that their DoCs are comprehensive, accurate, and fully compliant with the latest regulations. By understanding the key differences between MDD and MDR, and by addressing the challenges involved in setting up a correct DoC, companies can ensure that their devices are not only compliant but also safe and effective for patients. Due to the unclear situation, I would recommend always checking with the notified body whether they expect the list of (harmonized) standards at the DoC.

By Verena Wieser, Medical Device Consultant

If you are interested in attending one of our medical device standards training courses or need regulatory and compliance consulting, please contact us at info@lorit-consultancy.com. Our expertise will ensure your success!

CONTACT

Form

We look forward to hearing from you.

    Show privacy policy